AMP is Sourcegraph's autonomous coding agent that understands large, multi-repo codebases through Sourcegraph's code intelligence and completes tasks like implementing features, fixing bugs, and writing tests end-to-end. It integrates with GitHub and GitLab to open PRs, request reviews, and iterate based on feedback. AMP is designed for professional software teams who need an agent that can navigate enterprise-scale code without losing context. Access is via ampcode.com.
AMP Code is Sourcegraph's autonomous coding agent, built on the thing Sourcegraph has always done: understanding very large codebases. Rather than reasoning over the handful of files you have open, it draws on code intelligence across repositories, which is the part that usually breaks down when an agent meets an enterprise codebase spread over dozens of services. You give it a task such as implementing a feature, fixing a bug, or writing tests, and it works the task end to end. It also plugs into GitHub and GitLab, so the output arrives as a pull request that can be reviewed, commented on, and iterated through the process your team already runs. That framing matters. The unit of work is a PR in your normal review flow, not a chat transcript you have to translate into changes yourself.
AMP is aimed at professional teams whose main problem is scale rather than syntax. If a change has to touch several services, or if the hard part of a task is finding every place a concept appears before editing anything, cross-repo context is the differentiator and most assistants do not have it. It fits well-specified maintenance work: bug fixes with a clear reproduction, test coverage for an existing module, mechanical changes repeated across many call sites. It is less suited to greenfield prototyping where there is no codebase to understand yet, and less suited to solo developers on small projects, who are paying for a capability their repository does not need.
Devin is the other autonomous agent positioned to take whole tasks rather than assist while you type, and both produce work you review rather than watch. Augment Code shares the large-codebase premise closely, ingesting a repo and keeping persistent context, with agents that execute multi-step engineering work inside your editor. The practical difference between AMP and Augment Code is where you work: AMP leans on Sourcegraph's code intelligence and the pull request as the handoff, while Augment lives in the IDE. Cline is the lightweight counterpoint, an open-source agent in VS Code where you approve each step, which gives more control and far less autonomy across repositories.
Compare with: Devin, Augment Code, Cline
The catalog records AMP Code as freemium, so there is a way to try the agent before committing money, with paid usage for sustained work. Agent products of this kind usually meter on how much work the agent actually does rather than how many people can open it, which means cost tracks task volume. If your team is evaluating it, run it on real tasks in a real repository, since its whole argument depends on codebase scale and a toy project will not show the difference. Confirm current terms on the product's pricing page.
No notes have been added for this tool yet.
No prompting tips have been added yet.
No reviews yet. Be the first!